Find a Lawyer

SYED SABIR HUSSAIN SHAH versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

The words of the notification section RO III 1 6/72, dated 21.11 1981 and the schedule of the divisional director scope petitioner guaranteed the defendant's development that he was serving on the transfer to the Treasury Department. Punjab Local Fund Audit Department Service Rules, 1981 Punjab Local Fund Audit Department Service Rules The holding of the post of Divisional Director in 1981 means the holding of the post of Divisional Director in the Department, therefore, promoting the Respondents. Qualified to do so when the provincial director failed to file a case for success for the respondents because of the decision by the service director of the provincial director in the Local Fund Audit of the Punjab Supreme Court. Denied interference

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• MUHAMMAD SAEED BACHA v. Late BADSHAH AMIR 2011 SCMR 345
• GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary Agriculture and Livestock Department v. KHAN GINNERS (PRIVATE) LIMITED 2011 PLD 347
• MUHAMMAD ARSHAD v. State 2011 PLD 350
• Mst. MUMTAZ BIBI v. State 2011 SCMR 355
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE B, PESHAWAR v. ZABEEL PALACE HOTEL, PESHAWAR 2011 SCMR 361
• JAHANGIR SARWAR v. LAHORE HIGH COURT 2011 SCMR 363
• SHAHID ORAKAZI v. PAKISTAN through Secretary Law, Ministry of Law, Islamabad 2011 PLD 365
• EJAZ AKBAR KASI v. MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING 2011 PLC(CS) 367

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

inheritance advocates near Kot Bunglow lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes