Section 6666 ??? Applying the decision mode is favorable after filing an appeal The personal attendance of the accused was necessary for the declaration of judgment in the criminal case, regardless of where his personal attendance was sent during the trial or where the decision was made. Was, or was, to be bad. Just fine, but under Section 366, subsection (3) of the CR PC, the judgment rendered by the court should not be considered invalid, simply because neither party, or the person on the date of the declaration of the offense. Was absent. For any error in the service of notice to the parties regarding the decision, or the date of the decision and the place of declaration, the provisions under section 37537, CRPC, were applied in section 666666 (), CRPC. As a result, the decision has been made. In the absence of either party, making a decision in a criminal case was not an illegal act. There is no such provision in the Code of Criminal Procedure, as contained in section 6666, CR PC, for the declaration of judgment in the criminal appeal, which means that the legislature intended that the appellant in the decision appeal. The presence of, or the presence of, or being within the reach of the court at the time of its appeal is considered to be illegal. It was not a legal requirement that the court should do justice after examining the evidence. And the appellant could not be punished simply because he fled after filing an appeal to the Court of Appeal, who was fugitive after filing the appeal, even in his absence, the appellate court. Eligibility can be decided by.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
