ALI TRADERS RICE DEALER GUJRANWALA versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN
In order to recover Section 9, 10 and 22 Contract Act (IX of 1872), sections 173 and 176 suit treasury, the debtor's duty conferred on financing but insisted that the mortgaged goods bank Has been adjusted due to having. The debtor had disposed of the mortgaged goods against the recovery of the trust, dismissing the request by the banking court to defend the case and the case was decided in favor of the plaintiff bank due to the ban on the validity bank ban. Was obliged to return the goods with repayment of the debt with the jurisdiction of the appellate denied the exact details of the delivery order as well as receipt of the trust's issued trust and the stock report is not available on record. And the trial court dismissed the leave application to defend the case on a technical basis This was, therefore, the High Court refusing to comment further on the merits of this case as it could lead to discrimination. The banking court is allowed to appeal the remand after recording the evidence, setting aside the judgment and order of defense filed by the lenders.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
