Articles 302 (b), 324, 148 and 149 murder, attempt to murder, disturbance, conviction of composite evidence, reduction of confinement cases should be immediately FIR, opportunity for consultation and false. Sub-accused case The three witnesses made permanent statements about the accused's involvement in the case; witnesses were present on the spot at the relevant time of the incident. An eyewitness identified two firearms during the incident. In his presence, the eyewitness testimony at the time of the incident was substantially natural, and could not be denied simply on the basis that Free The previous enmity between the yen was not a hit-and-run case, but the incident continued for a while, giving the prosecution witness and other eyewitness testimony time to identify the suspects, and the role played by them. That happened on a grand day at GHT, and all four eyewitnesses described his presence on the spot as complimentary, the accused, formerly known as the prosecution witnesses, said the witnesses had made the accused. Make regular statements about the presence and the accused with whom the accused was formed. The unlawful assembly shared a common intention, brutally killed three innocent people, and injured the prosecution's witnesses. Yet, the prosecution's witnesses were subjected to prolonged scrutiny, however their defense There was some discrepancy in the statements made by the accused in this case. During the inspection, there was no loss in the prosecution of witnesses, eyewitnesses said.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
