SYED MUBBASHAR RAZA versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT
To arrest and detain suspects in the constitutional jurisdiction of Sections 3 (1), 6 and 26 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 199, 4, 9, 10, 13 (a) and 15 of the Constitution 199 Scope State was forced to secure the liberty of every citizen The government's move to ban the freedom of a citizen was not exempt from the High Court's scrutiny under Article 199 of the Constitution. I was already subject to criminal activity in Dentons. Under criminal prosecution, his detention on almost the same charges is equivalent to violating the ideological order twice under section 3 (1) of the West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960 against which criminal proceedings are already pending. Was. a) The customs authorities failed to prove that the Dantes were acting prejudicially for the integrity of Pakistan or the independence of public order. Ideas could not be reduced to mere speculations. The High Court was empowered to approve such (potential) orders without legal authority and to detain Section 3 (1) of the West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance 1960 with no legal effect. Satisfaction with the issuing authority is required. The detention order did not show / indicate / encourage the satisfaction of the Detention Order Authority, where the order passed against Detenio was illegal and in the eyes of the law, on the last few occasions under which such an order could be approved. The wrong thing to do, there was no need for a ditinue. How to file a representation before the government is always a solution to representation.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
