Attempts to commit Section 230b (b), 47 J, 7 337 Jammu and 34 Kotal Um, Qatil Ahmed, were hurt by poison. The testimony of the testimony from the joint intention was primarily based on the testimony of the accused and the real daughter of the deceased, who was 10/11 years old, and presented the motions and direct evidence of the incident, which both accused. Did. The court questioned her in this case and said that she was satisfied with the level of understanding of the witness and she not only faced the rigor of cross-examination but also stuck to her earlier statement, which was made in section 161, As stated under the CRPC, no material or significant improvement in his statement of testimony before the trial was made and his statement was not seen before the trial court and his defense could not be relied upon. ; And he answered numerous material questions in every aspect of the incident in a straightforward manner, saying that the witness continued to explain and corroborate his statement in the examination, and despite the best efforts, no benefit to the accused. Can't be healthy His statement by defense showed the maturity and confidence of Syed's testimony, stating that he was a true witness to his mother's malicious activities, which resulted in the death of his father and brother, The evidence was presented by a single witness, it was also found to be firm, inhuman and cruel to the circumstances and other evidence presented by the prosecution with the active participation of the medical evidence and their co-accused. Strikes the life of her husband and real son, and she also tries to deprive her of her five children. Valuable lives
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
