THE STATE THROUGH ADVOCATE-GENERAL, N.-W.F.P. versus SARFRAZ
Section 9 (a) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) of the High Court Opinion, hearing the appeal for change in the conviction of the accused in Section 9 (c) of Section 9 (c) of the Narcotic Material Stances Control Act 1997 ? The alleged weight of 80kg was recovered from the suspect's vehicle, 70 of which were sent to the Chemical Examiner for an opinion in the entire bulk sample of opium, the trial court found the accused under section 9 (c). Was sentenced to life imprisonment. Control of the Narcotic Sub Maintenance Act 1997, but on appeal, the High Court had changed the accused's sentence to Section 9 (a) of the said Act and reduced his sentence to two years. Separate opium for each review sample. Apart from that, opium was recovered. , Was not presented to the court by the magistrate for destruction under the orders of the trial court, no evidence was brought on record to prove that the samples obtained from the drugs were the same as those remaining. The material recovered was not fully linked to the drug containing the drugs recovered from the possession of the accused, the procedure required to eliminate the rest of the drug was neither followed nor according to the law. It was proved that the prosecution claimed that the quantity of opium was actually recovered from the possession of the accused accused, the Record High Core I was not proven, therefore, that he correctly concluded that the amount of 70 grams of opium reported was a Chemical Examiner's report, the recovered substance was and was presented before the court. I did not face any kind of illegal interference or weakness
