The benefit of the doubt was initially replaced by the accused influence person designated as an accused in the FIR, re-examining the evidence of Section 302 (b) of the Conan evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 46 and 129 (g) and A case was filed against the man who was later arraigned because the accused trial court convicted the accused under Section 302, PPC, for the murder of three persons and was sentenced to three counts of death. Was sentenced. Initially, the nominees were included in the FIR with a cloud of confirmation of the prosecution's version, and also that the complainant did not appear as a witness and two other prosecution witnesses were not presented during the trial and The only possible outcome was that the prosecution felt threatened to present them. The prosecution's witnesses do not support this version. Any reasonable doubt should be taken to the accused and the defense should not be merely a defensive prescription against the accused. Can be used. It was later introduced that the victim had forbidden one of the prosecution's witnesses to be associated with the accused, not that he might have indicated the killing of three people. The accused also introduced an element of unhealthy desire and enmity with the investigating officer because of past encounters due to false accusations. Kalashnikov, while the seven cases recovered by chance were not matched, it was also that the unrepentant fugitive was not enough to indulge in crime. It was a series of credible and credible evidence of all the events that led up to it.
