Find a Lawyer

SYED SABIR HUSSAIN SHAH versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

Notification SRO III I 6/72, Dated, 21 11 1981 and the words of the Schedule comprising the Divisional Director Scope Petitioner guaranteed the development of the defendant that he was serving on the transfer to the Treasury Department. Punjab Local Fund Audit Department Service Rules, Punjab Local Fund Audit Department Service Rules, 1981 Divisional Director's Word Holding Post means holding the post of Divisional Director in the department, so consider developing the respondents. Was eligible for. The provincial director failed to sue for the success of the petitioner respondents as the provincial director refused to interfere with the decision of the service tribunal in the Local Fund Audit of the Punjab Supreme Court.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION CO. LTD. v. IQBAL NASIR 2011 PLC(CS) 623
• GUL ALAM v. THE STATE through Advocate-General N.-W.F.P.; Peshawar 2011 SCMR 624
• SABIR ALI v. State 2011 SCMR 629
• THE STATE through Advocate-General, N.-W.F.P. v. SARFRAZ 2011 SCMR 641
• TAHIR KHAN v. State 2011 SCMR 646
• FAQIR HUSSAIN v. IBRAHIM 2011 PLD 648
• SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, CBR/FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD v. GUL MUHAMMAD 2011 PLC(CS) 651
• MUHAMMAD SHAUKAT v. ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. (ZTBL) 2011 PLC(CS) 656

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

criminal advocate from Daud Khel lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes