Article 42 Q: Constitution of Pakistan (Article 1984): Constitution 79 and Constitution 79; Constitution 79; I wish that the sale had been committed. The cancellation after being the result of fraud and misrepresentation, was confirmed by two witnesses in this case and only the second extraordinary witness was not presented. Even the stamp seller and the author were not produced. The executioner was not related to the defendant nor the slightest witness. S was not the owner and that no person of his trust was associated with the alleged transaction, under Art 17 and 79, legal evidence, in 1984, required at least two witnesses to prove the transaction. Was just a minor witness, who, however, was not aware of the details of this transaction and admitted that the woman was not present with anyone at the time of the request. The underwriting document was being written by the author; the lady was the woman of an illiterate village, not a man of her faith, in these circumstances, heavy responsibility, the defendants. To prove the transaction that they failed to exclude the High Court verdict. No misunderstandings or misreadings were identified in it. Even in the unanimous decision no illegal interference or weakness was found to warrant interference with the Supreme Court's right to properly accept this woman's review, contrary to the High Court's decision. Of appeal
