Sections 302/34 and 120b / 34 Katiel Ahmed and the republican accused of criminal conspiracy evidence did not agree on their behalf to represent the defense lawyer and conduct cross-examination on their behalf, prosecution witnesses and court witnesses The case was filed after the trial. No private consultant was involved and defense counseling services were provided at state expense, but the defendant was given the opportunity to examine himself, but he refused to do so, even the accused section. 342, remained silent during its investigation under CR PC and refused to accept or refuse any given response which was not intended by the accused to be unreasonable, unethical, immoral and unacceptable. Stumbling along the way was to deliberately delay the trial, without finding out the truth or the fault. The statements of the witnesses were decided by cross-examination, which was the most powerful engine. Passing statements recorded without a check for credibility can result in injustice and can result in substantial injustice to an invalid person. The safest rule was to allow a cross examination with appropriate opportunity, and likewise, a defense lawyer should be provided at state expense. Of the lawyers with competence, interest and trial of murder cases, although the accused had no choice but to claim the involvement of a particular lawyer on public expenditure, he was chosen by a lawyer on the defense list. Should be given the choice to do so. The current accused to be retained by a court lawyer
