Section 2 302 Qatiel Ahmed was the son of the deceased witness to examine the evidence and cultivates his land and explained that he had to go to his father-in-law's house and live there, he had a close relationship and member. The presence of the eyewitness in the said house was natural and routine, which was also supported by another dying eye witness who witnessed the incident, who knew the suspect as a fellow villager and had the opportunity to identify them. Was. Police were not registered by the said eye witness, as the victim's son had taken the census to the hospital, which confirmed by the doctor that he was cautious and capable of making statements, eyewitnesses said. The death toll on the deployment of the accused and the name of the accused in the incident were, according to the statistics. Based on the testimony of a single witness, if the court is satisfied that it is trustworthy, the accused attacked the family members in police uniform in the middle of the night and killed twelve people and does not deserve any relaxation. That without a recognized principle, the accused of the law could be shown the will of the law, who had removed the whole family from the ground, and upon receiving the punishment the death sentence was retained till the other accused. Is concerned, the only witness in the incident who did not name his statement was correctly acquitted by the High Court. The two appeals were dismissed accordingly
