Find a Lawyer

MALIK DAD versus KARRAR KHALID

Appeal to the Section 4 Service Tribunal Civil Civil Servant, instead of filing an appeal against the original order within a period of 120 days, chose to wait for its departmental appeal decision and lost the first opportunity to file a timely appeal to civil servants. The first period was allowed against the original order while the second opportunity was never created before the delay of twelve months as its departmental appeal was pending without any order and only the government employee on such appeal order. Could file his appeal. The limitation period for filing an appeal after the expiry date of his representation to take advantage of the external period, while in the absence of his Department of Appeal decision, the second period of limitation was never available to the original department. The appeal of the public servant against the order was like this, from time to time

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• SANOBAR KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through the Chief Secretary 2011 PLC(CS) 713
• ASIF IQBAL v. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KHUSHAB 2011 SCMR 720
• Mst. FAZAL BEGUM v. HASSAN KHAN 2011 SCMR 723
• NIAZ-UD-DIN v. State 2011 SCMR 725
• GHULAM RASOOL SHAH v. State 2011 SCMR 735
• Syed MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN SHAH v. ABDUL QAYYUM 2011 SCMR 743
• Mst. BIBI GHAZALA v. MEMBER, BOR PUNJAB, LAHORE 2011 SCMR 749
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Law v. MUNIR HUSSAIN BHATTI 2011 PLD 752

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

female advocates from Umer Kot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes