Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD AKBAR versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR


Section 424 West Pakistan Muslim Personal Law (Sharia) Application Act (v. 1962), Section 2A, Constitution of Pakistan, Section 185 (3) Title Declaration of past and closed deals, during the process of supplying the principle of application. In favor of the defendants through the civil courts passed, the revenue authorities refused to certify the change in their favor, relying on section 2A of the West Pakistan Muslim Personal Law (Sharia) Request Act, 1962. Following the verdict, it was implemented on 1 1982, according to the lawsuit. According to the decision of the Supreme Court judgment dated 14 11 1981, approval of the review application was granted to the defendant Malikana (ownership as owner) due to non-possession of real physical possession, with the approval of the review request. The allotted shares did not have any correction. On the approval of a decree amended by the Lower Appellate Court on 14 7 1981, the defendants became shareholders in the suit property, so only joint ventures could be made available because the property was not subject to physical possession. In the favor of the respondents, the decree was enacted on 1983, 1983, with the approval of alteration and occupation by Dal Malikana before the implementation of Section 2A of the West Pakistan Muslim Personal Law (Sharia). ) The Act, 1962, provided that the physical possession of the respondents was not necessary in favor of the respondents in accordance with the earlier and closed transactions under Section 2A of the West Pakistan Muslim Personal Law (Sharia) Application Act, 1962, the Supreme Court. Denied interference. In a decision passed by the High Court in exercise of constitutional jurisdiction, the respondents refused leave of appeal in favor of

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Guddu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.