CH. MUHAMMAD ZAFAR SAHI versus MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Article 199 Civil Aviation Authority Ordinance (XXX of 1982), Section 14 (a) Civil Aviation Authority Service Regulations, 2000, Regular 2 75, 3 38 and 4 22 (a) Constitutional Petition Retained Employee The effect of the federal government's approval of the Medical Allowance Medical Allowance was that the constitutional petition was not viable. The applicant falls into the category of transferor employee; his constitutional immunity will not be banned because of his conditions. The rules were to be followed. The Petitioner was employed by the Civil Aviation Department and his services were transferred to the Authority in 1982 from the rules and regulations applicable to the department where he enjoyed the employee benefits of retiring from the departments under the administrative control of the federal government. Increased pensions and other allowances from time to time, therefore, the applicant was entitled to the same candidates who were entitled to no less pension benefits than the pensioners of the Department of Civil Aviation, Department of Civil Aviation. The pensioners of the federal government came under the jurisdiction of the federal government and its employees were enrolled D were enjoying. "The applicant cannot be deprived on the basis that the memorandum was not adopted by the Board or the authority personnel, who were transferred to the authority after its establishment in 1982, he was entitled to all salaries and salary," the memorandum said. The allowance, which he was entitled to in his parents' department and no less favorable than that of the applicant, was entitled to the benefits of a Pakistan-issued office memorandum as an applicant transfer employee.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
