Section 2 302 (b) review of corroborative evidence and collar testimony was inconsistent with medical evidence. The incident occurred in the darkness of the night, rather than as a result of medical evidence, as alleged by the prosecutor. Punishment and punishment is the death penalty. The trial court charged the witnesses with evidence, which was contrary to the prescribed norms and that the abortion of justice was witness to the fact that the incident was unwarranted. The crime, which could testify at the time and circumstances of the events, was neither relevant to the investigation nor investigated in court, which could not be described as a cause, no crime from the scene, blood, brain. No substances or pellets were collected. The guns recovered from the suspect and his accompanying sibling suspect were not sent to the forensic science laboratory for testing, and ND Testing closely linked the witnesses to the witnesses, though to deny their own testimony. Was not enough, yet strongly suggested to be tarnished. A circumstance had negated the possible value of the molecular evidence, which the accused had acquitted.
