Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAKEEL versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) Qatil Ahmed Ocular's testimony was corroborated by constant and other evidence, that the deceased could not discredit the relationship of eyewitness to the crime weapon, whether there was a knife or a knife. Was used in the commission of KC and was alleged to be guilty of defective prescription of human blood, which the accused had submitted in his statement under section 342, CRPC did not confirm. Was He has been rightly sentenced and after being convicted of committing the murder of the victim, the accused was denied accordingly.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• THE STATE through Director-General, ANF v. SAID AHMED 2011 SCMR 908
• LIAQAT ALI v. State 2011 SCMR 910
• TAUQIR AHMED v. TAUQIR AHMED 2011 SCMR 916
• Syed HASSAN MEHDI v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 2011 PLD 916
• AZIZ AHMED v. MUHAMMAD RAMZAN 2011 SCMR 921
• Dr. NIGHAT BIBI v. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD 2011 PLC(CS) 921
• Dr. NIGHAT BIBI, PHYSICIAN, GENERAL MEDICINE, PIMS, ISLAMABAD v. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD 2011 PLC(CS) 921
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. State 2011 SCMR 925

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

criminal advocate from Sukkur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes