Find a Lawyer

TAUQIR AHMED versus TAUQIR AHMED

In the case of Ghulam Sikandar, the appeal against section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3), no violation of the principles laid down in the Supreme Court was reported as inappropriate decisions of SC 11 of PLD 1985. Interference guarantees can be identified. Based on the scrutiny of the abusive materials available on the record by the aforementioned courts, it was concluded that the accused was not guilty of the commission of the crime, and in the absence of the above infringement subject to any such interference. was not. Accordingly, the Supreme Court denied the complainant

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF BUTT v. MUHAMMAD ASIF BHATTI 2011 PLD 905
• SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN v. FIRST CAPITAL SECURITIES CORPORATION LIMITED 2011 CLD 907
• THE STATE through Director-General, ANF v. SAID AHMED 2011 SCMR 908
• LIAQAT ALI v. State 2011 SCMR 910
• Syed HASSAN MEHDI v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 2011 PLD 916
• MUHAMMAD SHAKEEL v. State 2011 SCMR 917
• AZIZ AHMED v. MUHAMMAD RAMZAN 2011 SCMR 921
• Dr. NIGHAT BIBI v. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD 2011 PLC(CS) 921

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

jobs for fresh advocates from Doltala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes