Find a Lawyer

SYED HASSAN MEHDI versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

Arts 204, 188 and 185 (3) contempt of court Ordinance (V 2003), Articles 3 and 4 of the Supreme Court decision Once the order has been finally accepted and approved, the same issue again protests. Was very difficult to do. Usually in relation to the cause of action before any forum which was initially before the Revenue Authorities and finally before the Supreme Court, dismissing the civil petition for leave of appeal, initiating contempt proceedings. Was rightly directed. High court petition dismissed against all relevant authorities for attempting to sit on appeal on decision passed by Supreme Court

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN v. FIRST CAPITAL SECURITIES CORPORATION LIMITED 2011 CLD 907
• THE STATE through Director-General, ANF v. SAID AHMED 2011 SCMR 908
• LIAQAT ALI v. State 2011 SCMR 910
• TAUQIR AHMED v. TAUQIR AHMED 2011 SCMR 916
• MUHAMMAD SHAKEEL v. State 2011 SCMR 917
• AZIZ AHMED v. MUHAMMAD RAMZAN 2011 SCMR 921
• Dr. NIGHAT BIBI v. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD 2011 PLC(CS) 921
• Dr. NIGHAT BIBI, PHYSICIAN, GENERAL MEDICINE, PIMS, ISLAMABAD v. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD 2011 PLC(CS) 921

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

jobs for advocates from Chohar Jamali lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes