The scope of the second appeal was limited to the scope of the second appeal and he only lied on the terms and grounds presented under section 100, CPC and otherwise was not said to be appealable only if the results were based on any evidence. , Or was returned in violation of any law, or considered by the subordinate courts as important evidence, but the fact is that it may be inaccurate or just plain wrong, no appeal is allowed. The finding of a coherence of the facts was avoided with the challenge only when the evidence was properly appreciated. ; And the terms viewed by Section 100, CPC were finalized. And the court will be liable that in the present case of alleged misreading and not reading of evidence and records, both subordinate courts misread the documents presented on the record and defended the defendants on the basis of the construction of legal documents. Was not done , Section 100, was in the CPC jurisdiction
