HASEEB AKRAM versus DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MIRPUR (A.K.)
Sections 3 523 and 505050 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Internal Constitution Act (VII of 444), the writ petition petition sought for a writ petition on suspicion of theft under which the underground vehicle was seized by the police. Bought the car from him. Subject to payment of Rs. 9,00,000 to the owner, of which Rs. 5,00,000 was paid by the applicant to the owner after the payment of the remaining value of the remaining owner's vehicle. Applicant has been handed over to the applicant, who was driving the same vehicle, when the police arrested him under Section 55050, the Cc Seed vehicle was later deputed by the police at Super Star. The commissioner remanded to restoration, while there was an unidentified order of possession, which was issued without legal authority because the police had to approve the confiscation order. There was not an option because the car was not stolen, nor was involved in the commission of a criminal. Section 235, under the CER police, was bound by law to notify the relevant magistrate of confiscating the vehicle under the CRPC, but this was not done and the order to confiscate the vehicle and Superdry was expressly declared illegal and was suspended, without any legal justification. The vehicle was ordered to be handed over to the applicant
