ABDUL RAUF versus COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION MANGLA DAM RAISING PROJECT, MIRPUR ZONE-II
Sections 4, 18 and 54 of the Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), O. XXXX, Rr 1, 2 The acquisition of the land was referred to the referee's court against the decision and order passed by the referee court, pending the decision of the referee. Reference was filed through The referee court dismissed the appellant by a separate petition, demanding the issuance of an interim order, which was issued under objections from the other side, that the appellant and the defendant were real brothers and sisters and their father Late property was never privately distributed. Or legally and all of them were the legal heirs of their deceased father, after reviewing all the names by their names, the remuneration of the legally acquired land in their names was all that they were entitled to. Shares are in range. The acquired land appellant, who claimed to be the sole owner of the acquired land, did not find any dispute that the balance of the facility was not in his favor. If we and the interim injunction against officers and respondents were issued, then the appellant's respondent siblings will suffer irreparable harm. They could not afford the compensation for which they were entitled by the authorities, if the applicant's version was accepted by a competent forum, they would not be entitled to any of the re-interim injunction issued against the respondents. Freedom to approach the appropriate forum. Empty, under conditions
