MUHAMMAD ADIL KIANI versus COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION, MANGLA DAM RAISING PROJECT ZONE-II, MIRPUR
Sections 4, 11, 23, 18 and 30 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XXXX, RR 1, 2 AJA Kashmir Interim Authorization Act (VIII of 1974), Section 44 Determination of Compensation Amount for Land Acquisition Prohibited, Vacation of land acquired pursuant to the provisions of the Land Tenure Act, 1894 Receipt of compensation by the collector in the name of the recipient, as well as the respondents owning the extent of their shares and ownership of the acquired land. The respondents had purchased the land for a long time, but the appellants did not consider the sale of the respondents as a result of advertising changes, conversions and revenue. Ndrajat was not challenged, calculate and determine compensation, in terms of millions of people, if not the, was established in favor of any additional relevant apylynt. In the future, if the land is acquired through any suitable forum, the applicants will have the legal right to refer to the relevant forum for their disposal. The appellant was entitled to receive compensation in his name, but the defendants were unable to receive compensation in their name in the presence of interim injunction, the balance of convenience is in favor of the defendant. And if the interim injunction is not vacated, the respondents will suffer irreparable and injurious damages; the interim injunction respondents, in the circumstances, were emptied.
