Section 1 3434 / Pro34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 (2A), the appeal for wrongful restriction against evil was included in the report presented before the trial court, but only one witness statement was recorded. The trial court, which was a spectacular witness, passed the order under appeal, ignoring the remaining witnesses, the two female designated accused were acquitted under section 696969, CRPC, but they said that the remaining in these cases. The facts of the acquittal cannot be grounded, which proved during the interrogation that it was the duty of the trial court. The statements of the remaining witnesses are bound to be recorded and the prosecutor was not given an appropriate opportunity to present his testimony in order to pass an appropriate order if any witnesses opposed or denied the prosecutor's story. If so, the accused cannot be acquitted on the basis of this. The record did not have sufficient evidence to support the trial of the said single witness, so that he could substantiate Brigg's order. The abortion of justice was the result of no such legal effect. , The accused could be convicted of crimes committed during police investigations, and if these crimes were proved even after the other important witnesses in these key statements, they would order a breakthrough. That was not at all stable, set aside and the trial was remanded to the trial court to settle the case after giving the remaining prosecution witnesses an opportunity to present evidence in defense. The case should be settled, if appropriate
