MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus MINISTRY OF HEALTH THROUGH SECRETARY, ISLAMABAD
Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdictional Termination of Civil Service Service Claims for Gratuity and Pension Benefits, which were taken on the Payroll of Society, terminated its services by giving one month's advance notice, in which petitioner Represented for the payment and payment of the grantee. The pensionary benefits, which were left without representation, petitioner appealed to the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court of Pakistan Red Crescent Society even though it was a legislature, but it had nothing to do with the functioning of the affairs of the Federation. Was based on the province or local authority's own Geneva Convention on which the society was a party and the purpose of the society, the applicant was issued an appointment, the society's 1974 rules clearly It was shown that the intention and purpose of all action measures, as a society, is an irreversible one. Of the organization, which was not only free, but one of the main aims was to receive complaints / grievances for the applicant's charity and to facilitate them, under the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court. The source could not be dealt with because no writ could be issued against the society. The Red Crescent's employees were not members of the civil society and could not be treated as the High Court of the province had no jurisdiction to issue entertainment and writ against the society. ? \ r \ n
