CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
Section 31 and 33 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Applicant Applicant Capital Development Authority suspended the interim order approved by the Member National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC) under section 31 of the Ordinance, under which the Development Authority The defendant, who was a retired employee, was prevented from retiring. The Development Authority respondents had earlier filed a permanent injunction to retain their possession, which was simultaneously rejected and the Development Authority's position was that the defendant was playing with the practice of law and en The IRC lacks jurisdiction because the matter was not one. The National Industrial Relations Commission approved the first ban on unfair labor practice, which was to continue for 71 days, and revealed itself to have discretion and open the sleeve. Whether or not a jurisdiction has been established with the member. Whether the NIRC or not the victim's son, who was a petitioner before the NIRC, had no right or right to keep it, therefore, the Member NIRC approved the jurisdiction of the courts He expressed disrespect for the orders made and said that the disappointing orders were denied and such action was nothing. But the arbitrary exercise of authority, abuse of law practice, shocking, daunting, unprecedented and without jurisdiction, the Member NIRC itself failed to comply with the provisions of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2011, as requested. The most personal complaint of the petitioner. Prior to this, only section 33 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2011
