MUHAMMAD IRSHAD UL HASSAN versus PAK PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (PAK PWD) THROUGH DIRECTOR-GENERAL
Article 199 Deputy Petitioner serving as Civil Service Assistant Engineer (BP17), under the command of the Office of the Executive Engineer BP17, to hold vacant vacancy charge for a limited period of time serving the federal government. It was allowed to hold the vacant post. For a period of three months, or until the posting of the Executive Engineer on a regular basis, whichever was the first applicant, suddenly moved to another location and replaced the respondent whose services were placed on deputation from another department. Was posted on Applicant Applicant has accepted responsibility for appointing respondent. Respondents cannot be welcomed because they were not employed by the federal government, but were employed by an independent body, and did not have the permanent appointment of an Executive Engineer. The applicant did not, in the circumstances, relinquish his duties as an Executive Engineer on the basis of the existing charge as per the terms of service, except that his Terms of Service Petitioner, who was on the verge of his retirement, could legally be replaced Could not be moved in which defendant's services were placed on deputation, finding transparent the High Court declared that the deposition of the defendants on deputation was illegal, against the entitled, unprecedented, revoked, orders of the higher courts. On the contrary, non-transparent, unnecessary, travel on interest and violation of the rights of regular employees It was also set aside that the defendant could be returned immediately. Applicants in their home department pray that the executive, based on the current charge
