INDUS RAGS THROUGH PROPRIETOR versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD
Article 18 (c) (1) and (4) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 77 and 199 of the China-China Free Trade Agreement (FTA), dated 24 11 2006 imported from China falling into the FTA category five The increase in the customs duty of the goods was the petitioner's request that, according to the FTA, the customs duty of such goods was to be stable, which was 25% at the time of FTA implementation, but by increasing it illegally. 35% was done. Accuracy The FTA was neither Pakistani law nor involved. There was no effect of amending the existing law of Pakistan and it would not enjoy the status of law, thus no writ could be issued for the enforcement of the right under which the petitioner was not a party to the FTA and Under this, only the parties can protest a violation of rights, but not so. The federal government of a third party has the power to raise or lower the priority rate in case of a reduction in the duty rate, and can file an appeal before the customs authorities, thereby preventing such a writ from being writ. Cannot be issued and inadequate treatment The High Court rejected the constitutional application in the circumstances. r \ n
