Find a Lawyer

SHEHBAZ AHMED versus STATE

Section 497 Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 406 breach of trust guarantee, denial of the accused was designated with a specific role in the FIR and names of witnesses whose presence was assigned to the accused. , Was also mentioned in the FIR. He disappeared without view and without responsibility, and was arrested a month after the incident, therefore, the delay in filing an FIR cannot be considered fatal because the complainant in such cases was initially not. Attempts to find out the accused and to approach the police as a last resort, the complainant or the police were not charged with any enmity, with which the accused is involved in a false crime. The accused was charged and non-bailable bail cannot be used in his favor. In the circumstances, dismissed

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2012

• AJMAL KHAN v. State 2012 YLR 1194
• OCEAN PAKISTAN LIMITED, ISLAMABAD. v. FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, through Chairman 2012 PTD 1209
• SHAZIA MANZOOR v. ESTATE OFFICE, through Estate Officer, Islamabad 2012 CLC 1209
• Ms. NAJAF HAIDER v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment Division, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad 2012 PLC(CS) 1220
• NADEEM ASGHAR v. Dr. Sheikh SIRAJ-UL-HAQUE 2012 CLC 1257
• MUHAMMAD IRSHAD UL HASSAN v. PAK PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (PAK PWD) through Director-General 2012 PLC(CS) 1275
• MUHAMMAD USMAN SYED v. COMSATS INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY 2012 MLD 1289
• INDUS RAGS through Proprietor v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Finance, Islamabad 2012 PTD 1293

All Islamabad judgments of 2012 →

best advocate from Usta Mohammad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes