Article 17 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition Tenant Bona's proof of personal need was granted by the tenant, landlord controlling the rights of eviction applications and the eviction order was upheld by the lower appellate court. If the withdrawal petition did not shake the proceedings or was rejected during cross-examination, it was sufficient to prove that the requirement was considered promiscuous and the courts did not question such requirement. The landlord demanded that his cover be removed for his personal needs and request The doctor / landlord who was a doctor had to be evacuated. To build a hospital for your own and your daughter's use, which was also a doctor, the landlord cannot be denied such rights if it appears that the tenant is evicted from the rental premises or building. Was given, or was not covered. Used for the purpose, it was evacuated somehow, then re-added to the premises when the tenant was created. The rent controller has been requested under section 17 (6) of the Islamabad Rent Restriction Ordinance 2001; the High Court, in exercising constitutional jurisdiction, refused to interfere with the joint orders by the two courts. Was excluded under circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n
