SHAHREZ ABDULLAH KHAN ROKHRI versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CIVIL LINE, LAHORE
Section 3 (b) and 15 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution liability for payment of wages, arrest on the petitioner's determination that he was not an employee to be recovered; it was mandatory on the Commissioner. ? Under the Compensation / Payment of Payments Act, 1936, as a threshold question to determine the action against which recovery should be initiated and brought into action, the Commissioner has existing property for such purpose. And the shareholders of the Industrial Establishment will have to inquire. Action may be taken against the employer or other person responsible for payment of wages, and it was to be settled as a fact before the recovery proceedings could be initiated under section 15 (5) of the Payment of Payment Act, 1936. , To which this section authorized attachment and sale. The High Court of the employer's immovable property remanded the arrest warrant pending against the applicant and Matt was remanded to authorities for the determination of the issue of identifying the person responsible for paying the wages or the other person.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
