Section A & b (b) Oscillation Oscillation Test The defendant applied for a declaration of being underage at the time of the commission offense, which was rejected by the trial court after a medical board inquiry and o ?? ciency test. ? The suspect was that when he was under the age of eighteen at the time of the commission of the crime, the legitimate accused applied for the declaration of adolescence, and he himself recommended the Ostification Test by the Medical Board and he was the one Was declared. Mandatory action in the meaning of Section 7 of the Young Medical System Ordinance, the 2000 Medical Board declared the accused 22 years 23 years old, whom he had not challenged, and he again raised suspicion on the opinion of the Medical Board. Did not demand. When the incident took place within the meaning of Section 2 (b) of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000 and the trial court's finding was not an accused child. The amendment was rejected if it was deemed valid and did not demand any intervention
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
