For the specific performance of the contract, Section 12 of the evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 17 and 79 of the oral contract plaintiff did not disclose the names of the witnesses to the plaintiff even before the alleged oral sale was made between the parties. There is no time period for completion. The seller's contract was mentioned by the claimant in his claimant and the oral contract of sale was valid in law but he had to prove it through credible and irrefutable evidence but contradiction with the alleged evidence of the sale agreement was on record, the plaintiff said. It was unsuccessful to prove that the possession of the suit property was transferred to him as a result of the sale agreement when no sale was made to the claimant at the time of the alleged sale transaction. I was unable to prove my case by requesting relevant details and witnesses and contract for sale. On the basis of the stipulated time period for the completion of the trial, both the courts had committed illegal and based on this the judgment of the case was decided by the trial court and the case filed by the plaintiff was decided by the lower courts. The result of not reading false statements and evidence that could not be sustained in the eyes of the law was the affected decisions and the orders passed by the courts below were set aside and the suit was dismissed with costs. Review was accepted
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
