ABDUL SATTAR versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KASUR
A. XVIII, Rr 1, 2 and 3 Qunun e Shahadat (10 of 1984), Article 130 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Article 12 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Application for the specific performance of a contract to sell real estate. Plaintiff's request for permission to present evidence in the form of witnesses for trial and witnesses' testimony and examination of witnesses, after approaching defendant's evidence, was simultaneously excluded; Asked for permission to present new evidence on this matter; the defendants conceded that even after the defendants' evidence was near, they had to present refusal evidence on all matters. The plaintiff was entitled. Plaintiffs and their defendants cannot be allowed to present proof of affirmation after the defendant's evidence is in close proximity, that is, the defendant had the right to resume the production of evidence when his right was supported , The plaintiff was solely responsible to the plaintiff and the plaintiff, who could only reserve the right to present evidence in relation to the matters for which he was the claimant. On the other hand, the orders of the courts below were correct. The constitutional application was dismissed as non-merit, in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
