Find a Lawyer

MST. SADIA BIBI versus STATE

Section 426 of the Control of Narcotic Material Stances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (C) was obtained from the suspension of the accused by the possession of 4 kilograms of hashish, which was wrapped in three packets and the culprits were also recovered. Arrests were made on the spot and the prosecution witnesses fully supported the recovery of marijuana on the spot and the Chemical Examiner's report was also positive; the High Court did not think it appropriate to give deep praise at this stage. Sentenced. Regular trial and trial court resulted in the jurisdiction that the prosecutor proved his case beyond reasonable doubt, the High Court refused to suspend the sentence given by the trial court petition. Conditions

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015

• SAEED AHMED v. State 2015 YLR 140
• ASKARI LEASING LTD. v. PRESIDING OFFICER 2015 PLD 140
• MUHAMMAD WAQAS GUL v. WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2015 PLC(CS) 144
• FLYING CEMENT CO. LTD. v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Water and Power 2015 PLD 146
• UNITED SUGAR MILLS LTD. v. FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE 2015 PTD 152
• ABDUL SATTAR v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KASUR 2015 MLD 152
• TAHIR MEHMOOD v. State 2015 PCrLJ 153
• SHAHREZ ABDULLAH KHAN ROKHRI v. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CIVIL LINE, LAHORE 2015 PLC 155

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2015 →

patent advocate from Bisham lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes