Sections 497 (1), Fifth Section Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 392, 394 and 411, in connection with a robbery, voluntarily committing a robbery, property burglary of dishonesty, trial Refusing to delay the conclusion, Effect Bell moved the defendant through legal delay at the conclusion of his trial, but the defendant and his co-accused had committed the crime at trial. And demanded adjournment from one to another when seventeen (17) occasions were postponed. When trial witnesses were present to examine them through a trial court adjustment obtained by a defense party in a particular situation, the dozen dates that followed the hearing could have been lost. The lengthy operation was not performed by the complainant and the witnesses. Not only forcible mobile phone snatching but also for killing a person in the process, such crime made the accused frustrated or hard-wired; The C-bail applications were rejected by the trial court instructing them to dismiss the case within six months.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
