Section 21 M & 28 Joint Trial The Anti-Terrorism Court may also try any other offense under the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, with the accused charged in the same case under the Code of Conduct 1898. Can be done This offense was linked to another such offense, if, during a trial under the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, it was discovered that the accused had committed another offense under the aforesaid act, or at that time Under any other law, the court may convict the accused for such other offense and may approve any sentence under the Anti Terrorism Act 1997, or such other law as the case may be. The provisions of Section 21M of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 did not authorize. The Anti-Terrorism Court empowers the Chief Justice to withdraw any case pending in or outside his jurisdiction before acting in regular court under the administrative control of the provisions of section 28 of the Anti Terrorism Act 1997 It was a matter of the High Court, if it seemed appropriate to do so in the interest of justice. Or where necessary to facilitate witnesses or to protect or defend the accused, transfer any case from the Anti-Terrorism Court to another Anti-Terrorism Court, within or outside the Counter-Terrorism Court, where the case was transferred, Will deal with this. The case at this stage, which was pending before such an exchange, and it will not be obligatory to cancel and listen to any witness, who gave evidence and can follow the evidence already provided: Provided that the Anti-Terrorism Act Section 28 of the
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
