MST. FARIDA GUL AGHA versus SHEIKH MUHAMMAD NASEEM
The scope FIR filed by the complainant against the section 1 561 petitioner was dealt with by the magistrate under Class C and the complainant did not challenge the order of the magistrate before any court, on the order of the magistrate. The final complaint was made later on the direct complaint on the facts stated in the earlier FIR, which the magistrate had disposed of, there was some litigation between the applicant and his in-laws, it seems that the complaint The petitioner has become the source of the applicants' in-laws and filed a false case against the applicant where the court was lodged. Shall have been used in the process. And that the requirement of justice, immediate, real and concrete justice, will be granted to the court an unlawful jurisdiction to prevent any party from harassing and abusing the legal complaint process in this case, As an example of applicant rules, the applicant, who was an elderly woman in one or the other criminal proceedings, had to come to the rescue to save the innocent person. The petitioner's case was an unusual case in which jurisdiction could be filed under Section 6161A, CRPC. Used without waiting for the order to be passed under section 249A or 265 of the trial court, the CCPC's current case will have to be permanent before the trial court, wasting time and misapplying the court court process. Use of unusual jurisdiction under Section 6161A, CRPC, terminated proceedings created after a complaint
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
