PAKISTAN NATIONAL SHIPPING CORPORATION versus MALIK AYAZ SHARIF
Regions 14 and 17 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), 5 115 Re-jurisdiction, Purpose and Final Conclusions of Fact by Two Courts Below the Claimant, Pakistan National Shipping Corporation resigns for 26 years The plaintiff later sought his recovery, the trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff on the amount of money provided by him during his services as Provident Fund, and the lower appellate appeal filed by the defendants. The court dismissed, the High Court's jurisdictional amendment jurisdiction was primarily to remedy the errors of the subordinate courts. False judgments of facts in the exercise of their jurisdiction were generally not revised except when there was an evidence, irrevocable evidence or misleading decision so that serious injustice could be done and the review jurisdictional. , The court could interfere with the discovery of the courts only if such courts existed. Illegally and exercising their jurisdiction in contravention of any provision or law of the law, irrelevant factual inquiries or concurrent inquiries on a mixed question of law and facts, if false reading or proof If you are incapacitated or are based on any evidence or irrefutable evidence, the High Court in the jurisdiction of the review should correct the mistake made by the subordinate. Courts but on the basis of such a question with the two courts below due to a misrepresentation or defect of not reading the evidence, the High Court's interference in the review will be a misconduct of the amended jurisdiction and the review of the evidence again is not valid. Was. If any
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
