Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 392/34 Robbery Guarantee, the grant of a further inquiry order granted by the trial court, under which the defendant's bail application was rejected, is very vague and Was speaking and contradicting its facts. The case was told by the trial court that the accused was identified on the spot by the complainant, while the FIR stated that the complainant was not present at the scene and the complainant's wife was identified by his voice. That a weak evidence could not hold such an order because the trial court did not provide any reason for the rejection of the bail, the defendant's case being that the grant of bail in connection with the inquiries for which the maximum sentence was ten Less than a year was a right and the denial of an exception denied the accused was admitted on bail, under the circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
