Section 7 367 sets forth the general principles of the jurisdictional order of language and decision which should be the cause of every order passed under the provisions of any law in judicial or judicial capacity, and Not merely in nature, it cannot be termed a subjective order, nor is the law expressly endorsed for any reason, but in the Commonwealth it refers to an action or order passed by this person, officer or authority. That is reasonable and in line with the requirements of reasoning, the cause can be ascertained. Examine the results in the order and if there is no discussion or any inquiry and this order has been approved by simply reproducing the words used in the Constitution, it is justified for the reasons. Such an order would be non-judicial, should show a link between the material on the WW to justify speaking and the irrational order. Some of its specific conclusions are conclusive and the actual results are in each case in which the appeal Or revision is false, the authority needs to approve the order to record the results and record To discuss the material, so that the appellate court can examine whether the order was approved according to the material available on the record or that there is no false statement or readings in the evidence, or that any material fact on the record was ignored. Has led to the misunderstanding of justice.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
