KHAZAN TECH. (PVT.) LTD. versus SYED FAYYAZ AHMED SHAH
Sections 17 and 24 Tenants were ordered to expel the former part order eviction tenant on the basis that it was not served properly. Properly the leaseholder adopted the legal procedure and provided the tenant with the full opportunity, while the tenant was still complete despite serving the court notice. Knowledge of the court proceedings, deliberately avoiding fighting the case and trying to create a false premise of non-service, which is against the record of this case, in the memorandum of appeal by the tenant. The facts of the case were not disclosed and were confirmed. The High Court itself was hesitant to examine the record and proceedings (R&P) of the tenant's case and their claim regarding non-service of court notices cannot be accepted under the facts and circumstances. The tenant's tendency to rent proceedings was deliberately avoiding service of judicial notice or failing the court proceedings to obtain time. N The feature that should be noted and prevented in appropriate cases. It is necessary to have the eviction order approved by the rent controller; in the present case, no realistic error or legal weakness was encountered, so no intervention was required by the High Court; the appeal was dismissed. I
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
