If the court's reliance on sections 168 and 172 police diaries was inadvertently presented to the court, the scope police diaries cannot be accepted as evidence in this case and the court does not want to take the statement contained in the diary which it Will be helpful in coming When the decision of the case was used by the diary, it was impossible to avoid the conclusion that he had let his mind be affected by the fact that he was not present in the present case, which was not in the diary investigation officer. Was recommended. In an Investigation A class, which was filed by the Senior Investigation Officer, police, it was not shown that the police officer had recommended dealing with the matter in Class A, but he reiterated the investigating officer's opinion. And had pushed ahead for it. In the legal opinion case, the accused did not apply for bail on the basis of a police diary, nor was the lower court misled by a diary. The bail was disposed of on merit. The police officer submitted that there was a clerical error in the police diary and that the class A was mentioned. The sheer mistake, which was a typographical mistake, and did not prejudice the interest of any party, was also apologized by the police and demanded to be cautious in the future, neither at the time of the bail plea decision. There was no inquiry nor any trial. The lower court and charge sheet were presented before the bail order, stating that the police diary was either inadvertently presented or because of a major error that did not prejudice the trial. That
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
