7th XVII, R 3 Land Acquisition Act (I Constitution of 1894), Article 199 The administration of constitutional justice, despite numerous occasions, dismissed the evidence for lack of proof, the applicant closed the tribunal's order under which the applicants were given evidence. The right to submit has been discontinued. The applicant's argument was that the law favors a decision on the merits, rather than punishing a party on the basis of technical ability, if against any party, if XVII, R 3, the terms of the CPC If pressured, any action is taken against them. Normally, one can be considered merely technical; but where a negative order was passed against a party for failing to comply with a court order despite numerous occasions, in the present case it is not mere technical evidence of the applicant. Could be understood. Was not temporarily closed, but was done after the applicant had committed every possible opportunity to present evidence so an unknown order did not occur because of any illegal interference, the constitutional application was dismissed. Is, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
