PERVAIZ & CO. THROUGH PROPRIETOR versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN
Section 22 High Court (Lahore) Rules and Orders Volume V; Chapter I, Part A, RR 9 and 9A Appeal, Filing on Disposal of Objections Duty of Appellant Appeal under Section 22 of the Financial Institutions (Finance Recovery) Ordinance 2001 Was filed within time, however, when it was returned by the deputy. With the High Court Registrar (Judicial) objections, it took three years for the appellant to finally reject the appeal after all objections were resolved. Appellant's position was that the said objections were irrelevant and therefore the appeal should now be heard, even though the appeal was filed within time. The appellant also had a duty, when the office raised the objection, to receive the appeal and within a reasonable time to remove the same thing which is usually seven days after the removal of all objections, when the prescribed period of limitation under the law I had filed an appeal. ; Then in the event of delays in processing the instructions or objections raised by the court office; two options were available for litigation. One was to comply with the objection raised and the other was to request the office of the office to put the matter before the court for determination of the authenticity of the office's objections. In the present case, when the office raised the objection, the appellant withdrew the appeal and filed the same again without removing some objections, and then the appeal was returned and eventually all objections were removed and in the process the appellant. Spent more than three years and no explanation was given for a period of three years. Such contradictory action by the appellant has caused the appellant in some way
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
