NAYYER KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, RAWALPINDI CANTT.
Article 199 Constitution Petition litigation public interest litigation / distressed person - who has "substantial interest in ope scope has no rights or interests infringed" Public shopping malls constructed by military authorities The land in question regarding the military land, which the respondent leased to the respondent company for the construction of the shopping mall, was a long-term lease agreement in favor of the company for the sale of public land Was going to the relevant authorities of the military and a small amount of that money was going to the federal government, and this respondent The company was making huge profits at government expense The current issue was not a matter of public money or the use of the resources handed over to the military by the Federal Government, which owns the land, which they deem appropriate. It was never allocated for any public purpose or for any public use, but was given to military authorities by the relevant administration. Military authorities were managing the property where various business activities were carried out and were present. Even today, in fact, the masses benefited from such trading activities and there was no objection to any commercial activities or management by the applicant. There was no long-term lease sale in favor of a shopping mall-producing company. ? The shopping mall had no objection to the construction of the land and the project contract or lease agreement so no right or interest of the applicant or the public was involved or was violated. The public was denied access to the land. Was. And mass shopping
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
