In section 2 (2 (b) and Q 34 of the case) the amd, the joint intention to convict the evidence, the reduction of the crime report was recorded without any conscious or intentional delay, the complainant was the real brother of the victim, and The prosecution's second witness was the nephew of the two, even though they had intercourse with the victims, yet they had no motive to be involved in any felony charge of any felony, only the prosecution's witnesses did so. Was not enough to disprove their testimony, especially when the incident at their respective times was quite natural and The presence of the scene was not denied by Au. Both said the witnesses were stable and stable about the accused's position, saying that the witnesses were up to their version and despite lengthy scrutiny, witnesses Accordingly, the defense statements could not have any beneficial effect for the accused, they were straightforward, co-ordinated and reliable. The incident was a widespread incident and due to the prior identification of the parties, the question of misidentification would not arise. Prominent co-accused case related to prohibition, trial court dismissed hunger strike and satisfied Yes, the complainant did not prefer any appeal against him who said that the accomplices had dismissed the medical evidence, had fully confirmed the account information, no crime was cleared by the investigating officer. The crime weapon, namely 12 bore guns, was recovered at the suspect's notice, not sent from the scene of the incident. In the absence of a forensic science laboratory laboratory report, the crime arm
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
