Section 319 / QQ / Assessing Defective Evidence Evidence of the deceased's mother who appeared as a prosecution witness was merely evidence of the deceased's deceased deceased's father who appeared as the prosecution's witness, not only his They were opposed to the inspection but also failed to identify the accused persons who were present in the trial court. Both investigating officers, during interrogation, could not submit the contents of the accused to the commission of the crime and filed the case. During the hearing, the prosecution did not produce impressive evidence of trust, but the officers admitted that there was no evidence against the accused. He said he had pressed his lying and did not require the oath, which was not considered a significant value to the evidence, the trial court had sentenced the accused was based. The prosecution's chief witnesses examined and ignored material contradictions and theories that were presented during cross-examination in their evidence that did not qualify the entire evidence under section 176, CRPC. The purpose of the investigation was not only to identify the cause of death. Such an inquiry does not impose a conviction on any person's guilt or innocence, which cannot be ascertained the findings given by the sub-divisional magistrate who conducted a judicial inquiry into the accused's involvement in the murders. And on the basis of such results, the registration of this case was terminated. The legal cleansing investigation was not up to the mark of the investigating officers during the investigation, did not record the statement of the doctor who examined the deceased and provided medical assistance to him. Not only during this but also during the investigation
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
