M. YOUSUF ADIL SALEEM & CO. CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS versus MUHAMMAD SALEEM
Section 32 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O XXXX, Rr 1 and 2 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 42 and 54, Declaration and Decree Interim Order, Contributing to Contribution Concerns Claim release of custodial procedure According to the circular resolution, the defendants were suspended from the management of the legality where the partnership provided for retirement, where such an alternative to solitary retirement was adopted. If a task needs to be done in a particular way then it should be done in this manner alone. The partnership process provided for retirement and the matter came under section 32 (1) (b) of the Partnership Act, 1932; the circular resolution was not approved by a majority vote of 3 / 4th. Alihan had 29% 07% stake in the partnership firm not only was the firm's partner but he was a deputy managing partner as well as a member of the board managing partner or deputy managing partner for a period of 5 years and I was a partner of the partners. the general meeting to choose the managing partner in the event of the managing partner's demise or retirement, nor the managing partner died Nor did he take retirement from this partnership firm, so, even without a second partner, he could not be the chief executive of the firm. In the matter of partnership, the circular resolution regarding the suspension of the defendants in the post of chief executive was adopted in other cities after the interim orders were passed by the civil court for which the defendants filed a contempt of court petition The defendants had no case and the balance was balanced. The facility is also available
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
