Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. XXXIX, Rr. 1 and 2 of the Unlawful Settlement Act (XI of 2005), Sections 3 and 4 are subject to interim injunction, hiding the facts for the specific performance filed by the respondent. Was excluded but the plaintiff was not in possession of the suit property by a special order in this suit, nor did the plaintiff file a lawsuit for the occupation, nor did the plaintiff mean the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005 I preferred filing a criminal complaint, and it was seized as an interim action. After the trial property was legalized, the interim action was subjected to the final outcome of the criminal complaint and the criminal court directed the plaintiff to surrender the possession of the suit property to the plaintiff. The plaintiff was not in legitimate possession of the property and / or The plaintiffs were not trying to oust the plaintiff from the case. Without legal action, property, when the case was filed by the plaintiff, hiding the fact, the plaintiff received the advertisement. The verdict did not come into the hands of the plaintiff's High Court, and no suit or suit was sought in favor of it. No balance, High Court denies interim injunction, petitions dismissed
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
